top of page

This blog on Charity Commission Exposed evidences that the Charity Commission:

is incompetent, ineffective, inefficient, dishonest and unethical;
wastes taxpayers' money;

is not fit for purpose
 

  • Charity Commission ExposedTwitter

Charity Commission Exposed is on Twitter

The Charity Commission faces more questions

  • Writer: Trinity
    Trinity
  • Jun 30, 2018
  • 1 min read

Updated: Jul 1, 2018

21feb18


Dr Izzadeen Chowdhury's article has raised some good questions for the Charity Commission to answer. 

Dr Chowdhury thinks it’s possible that the Commission has a different set of rules depending on whether charities are Muslim or non-Muslim.

Now, we all know the Charity Commission is under-funded [just exactly like some of the chariies they bully and regulate], because they keep telling us.

So is it possible that, despite Sir Stephen Bubb’s warning, too much of the Commission’s meagre resource has been used on Muslim charities? Non-Muslim charities should be right upset about this - why so biased?

Could it be that, as a result, whisteblowing and safeguarding have been neglected by the Commission - along with dialogue with trustees and visits to charities?

And that, in Dr Chowdhury’s words: “ It seems Sir Stephen’s concerns fell on deaf ears with the most vulnerable women and children paying the price.”


Trinity


Comments


The Charity Commission is part of the bureacracy matrix

Created in WIX : 2018

bottom of page